The Scope for Dialogue with Security Forces in Hybrid Regimes

Hybrid regimes are generally defined as governments that combine democratic and authoritarian traits. They are flexible by definition and design and can quickly transform from what appears to be a democratic phase with competitive elections and some political openness, to a phase that is more politically restrictive and repressive – and then back again.

This IFIT discussion paper – which draws upon in-depth IFIT research, interviews, and convenings with leading experts on the role of security forces in hybrid regimes – offers evidence-informed analysis of 1) the typical sources of resilience of hybrid regimes, 2) the mechanisms used by ruling parties to gain control or secure the loyalty of security forces, and 3) how civic and democratic forces can overcome common dilemmas when attempting to engage and dialogue with security sector actors in such contexts.

The DOI registration ID for this publication is: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10473758

You may also be interested in

publication / Law and Peace

Effective Participation in Political and Peace Negotiations

Available in:

• English
• Español

publication / Law and Peace

Negotiating with Violent Criminal Groups: Lessons and Guidelines from Global Practice

Available in:

• English
• Español

publication / Law and Peace

“Horizontal Peacebuilding”: A New Concept Developed by IFIT’s Territorial Trust in Colombia

Available in:

• Español

publication / Law and Peace

Negotiating with Criminal Groups: IFIT Guidance Note for Good-Faith Promoters

publication / Law and Peace

Partial Agreements: The Functional Alternative to All-Encompassing Settlements

publication / Law and Peace

Effective Participation in Political and Peace Negotiations

Available in:

• Español