IFIT / WELCOME TO THE PEACE TREATY INITIATIVE
The Peace Treaty Initiative
The Peace Treaty Initiative is a new global initiative to help develop an international law of peace negotiation. Filling a critical gap in the existing laws of war – which mainly regulate how to fight – the Peace Treaty Initiative aims to facilitate global consideration of a purpose-built multilateral treaty to help incentivise warring parties to choose the pathway of negotiation, in order to prevent armed conflicts in the first place and to end them once underway. Follow the Peace Treaty Initiative on Instagram at @PeaceTreatyInitiative
Scroll down for more
The initiative builds on three years of legal research, diplomatic and expert interviews, and meetings hosted by IFIT and its global partners. This culminated in an “indicative text” of the proposed treaty, which is meant to offer a practical starting point for a deliberately inclusive global consultation process.
UN member states, as well as multilateral organisations, academia, faith-based entities, think tanks and human rights NGOs from around the world, will have the opportunity to provide input and feedback on the indicative text through participation in regional and thematic workshops and high-level consultation events.
Public Commentary / 20 July 2022
Scotland TV feature with IFIT’s Mark Freeman and Asli Ozcelik Olcay: the Peace Treaty Initiative and the conflict in Ukraine
post / 05 May 2022
PAST EVENT: Special session on the Peace Treaty Initiative at the EUI State of the Union Summit
Public Commentary / 15 March 2022
Getting back to what matters: Victim voices and the making of international law
Public Commentary / 28 February 2022
Negotiating amnesties, peace and justice: a new path
Public Commentary / 28 February 2022
Here is a way for international law to better help end conflicts
Public Commentary / 26 October 2021
Blog Symposium: Peace Treaty Initiative
post / 17 September 2021
PAST EVENT: Building the International Law of Peace Negotiation – IFIT event at the Carter School Peace Week
post / 30 April 2021
PAST EVENT: Building the International Law of Peace Negotiation – IFIT event at the Stockholm Forum on Peace and Development
What does international law currently say about peace negotiations?
- Almost nothing. Article 33(1) of the UN Charter provides that “The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.” However, there is no body of international law that offers legal incentives or an organised framework to make the choice of peace negotiation more attractive at the start, more flexible and organised in the middle, and more stable at the end.
Can this legal gap be filled with voluntary principles and guidelines?
Voluntary principles and guidelines can be helpful for practitioners, but a legal gap can only be filled – and legal incentives and guarantees can only be created – through a legal instrument.
Why would states want to sign a treaty on peace negotiations?
- Conflicts are exacting a heavy toll on states and their citizens, who would welcome a treaty making it easier to end wars. That said, the eventual content of the treaty will determine the level of state interest. States sign up to multilateral treaties when the benefits of doing so are greater than the burdens.
Is there a draft of what the treaty would look like?
- Yes. It is an indicative text and subject to the feedback arising through the global consultation process (see below).
Could the treaty lead to a situation in which negotiation is imposed on an unwilling state?
- No. While the existence of the treaty would increase the attractiveness and stability of peace negotiations, a state party would retain control over which situations it wants to have handled under the treaty.
Could the treaty risk reducing the flexibility or confidentiality that negotiating parties require?
- No. One of the central aims of the proposed treaty is to increase the flexibility and control that negotiating parties have over the process – while simultaneously making available to them new support mechanisms and a clear system for the validation of their key choices.
Would the proposed treaty restrict what can be agreed between the negotiating parties?
No. The parties would control all the decisions. At the same time, the treaty could offer substantive benefits that are unavailable today. For example, as reflected in the indicative text, a “presumption of conformity” with international law could be conferred upon agreements that reflect certain minimum criteria. This would increase international respect for the agreement.
Would the treaty alter or improve the legal status of non-state armed groups?
- No. The indicative text makes it more attractive for non-state armed groups to make the choice to negotiate, but excludes any change in their legal status by virtue of that choice.
Does the treaty restrict the use of force by states?
- No. The indicative text envisages that the existing international legal rights and obligations of states over the timing and manner of the use of force would remain unchanged.
Can I see the indicative text of the proposed treaty?
- The text – which will continue to be developed in response to consultations – will be discussed at an ongoing series of high-level regional and thematic workshops in partnership with leading multilateral, academic, and nonprofit institutions across the globe.
Who supports this initiative?
- IFIT is facilitating the global consultation process and is supported by a high-level Expert Advisory Group. More generally, the initiative is supported by IFIT’s donor partners and global experts, including members of the Law and Peace Practice Group. Over time, a purpose-built strategic alliance will be created in order to bring the treaty to fruition.
How can I or my institution get involved?